Dave Korn wrote:
> But consider also
> http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/README.SCO
Which calls them "not a serious threat." I hadn't been closely
following this, but that sure seems to be the case given last
week's ruling.
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070812-sco-never-owned-unix-copyr
On 14 August 2007 15:54, DJ Delorie wrote:
> The FSF has asked us to not directly support any ports to SCO.
>
> See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/sco/
>
> That request has not yet been rescinded.
But consider also
http://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk/README.SCO
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't t
The FSF has asked us to not directly support any ports to SCO.
See http://www.fsf.org/licensing/sco/
That request has not yet been rescinded.
