On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 2:57 PM 钟居哲 wrote:
>
> Hi, Richard.
>
> I saw this following code:
>
> if (LOOP_VINFO_CAN_USE_PARTIAL_VECTORS_P (loop_vinfo))
> {
> if (direct_internal_fn_supported_p (IFN_VCOND_MASK_LEN, vectype,
> OPTIMI
01-09 16:59
To: 钟居哲
CC: richard.guenther; rdapp.gcc; gcc
Subject: Re: RE: Loop vectorizer optimization questions
Hi,
The 01/08/2024 22:46, 钟居哲 wrote:
> Oh. It's nice to see you have support min/max index reduction.
>
> I knew your patch can handle this following:
>
>
>
;
> juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
>
> From: Tamar Christina<mailto:tamar.christ...@arm.com>
> Date: 2024-01-09 01:50
> To: 钟居哲<mailto:juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>; gcc<mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
> CC: rdapp.gcc<mailto:rdapp@gmail.com>;
> ri
approach but turns out
Richi doesn't want me to apply LLVM's approach so your patch may be more
reasonable than LLVM's approach.
Thanks.
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai
From: Tamar Christina
Date: 2024-01-09 01:50
To: 钟居哲; gcc
CC: rdapp.gcc; richard.guenther
Subject: RE: Loop vector
>
> Also, another question is that I am working on min/max reduction with index, I
> believe it should be in GCC-15, but I wonder
> whether I can pre-post for review in stage 4, or I should post patch (min/max
> reduction with index) when GCC-15 is open.
>
FWIW, We tried to implement this 5 year
