org; Vinod
> Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
> Subject: Re: Live on Exit renaming.
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bin.Cheng [mailto:amker.ch...@gma
ichard Biener;
> gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli
> Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
> Subject: Re: Live on Exit renaming.
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>>&
org;
> Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
> Subject: Re: Live on Exit renaming.
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>>> I am not sure why the above optim
on Exit renaming.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>> I am not sure why the above optimization is not implemented in GCC.
>
> -fsplit-ivs-in-unroller
>>And thing might have changed. Given t
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 6:02 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
>> I am not sure why the above optimization is not implemented in GCC.
>
> -fsplit-ivs-in-unroller
And thing might have changed. Given the condition GCC does IVO on
gimple, unrollin
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Ajit Kumar Agarwal wrote:
> I am not sure why the above optimization is not implemented in GCC.
-fsplit-ivs-in-unroller
Ciao!
Steven
Sorry for the typo error.
The below is the corrected Fig (1).
While (a[i] != key)
I = i+1;
Return I;
Fig (1).
Thanks & Regards
Ajit
-Original Message-
From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On Behalf Of Ajit
Kumar Agarwal
Sent: Saturday, July 04, 2015 7:15
