Karthikeyan M wrote:
Oh ! So the releases on http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html are for
those who just want to use gcc and not hack it ?
Is the latest release not done from the top of the trunk ?
No; the top of the trunk is far too unstable for releasing. Release
branches are split off of tru
Oh ! So the releases on http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html are for
those who just want to use gcc and not hack it ?
Is the latest release not done from the top of the trunk ?
Is there any tool that I can use visualize the repository ? A tool
that shows a visualization like
http://en.wikipedia.org
On 3/20/07, Karthikeyan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are these macros not a part of 4.1.2 ?
I just picked up the tarball of the 4.1.2-core source.
Which release has this code ?
4.2 or 4.3
You should never try to be doing real development work on GCC against
anything but the development trunk (
On Mar 20, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Karthikeyan M wrote:
Are these macros not a part of 4.1.2 ?
4.1.2, what's that?! :-)
I just picked up the tarball of the 4.1.2-core source.
Pick something that says 2007 and 4.3... :-)
In general, new work is best done against the top of the tree, that
is t
Are these macros not a part of 4.1.2 ?
I just picked up the tarball of the 4.1.2-core source.
Which release has this code ?
Thanks a lot.
On 3/20/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/20/07, Karthikeyan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks.
> Where exactly should I be looking?
cg
On 3/20/07, Karthikeyan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks.
Where exactly should I be looking?
cgraph.c, cgraphunit.c, cgraph.h
see cgraph_varpool_nodes, FOR_EACH_STATIC_VARIABLE (static here means
having scope greater than a single function, it does not mean "all
variables declared static in C
Thanks.
Where exactly should I be looking?
Will the cgraph nodes also have global declarations that are never
used inside any
function .
On 3/20/07, Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/20/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19 March 2007 22:16, Karthikeyan M wrote:
>
> > What
On 3/20/07, Dave Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 19 March 2007 22:16, Karthikeyan M wrote:
> What should I do if I want a list of all file-scope variables inside
> my own pass ?
>
> The file_scope variable is local to c-decl.c . Is there a reason why
> the scope holding variables are local to
On 19 March 2007 22:16, Karthikeyan M wrote:
> What should I do if I want a list of all file-scope variables inside
> my own pass ?
>
> The file_scope variable is local to c-decl.c . Is there a reason why
> the scope holding variables are local to c-decl.c ?
Because we want to keep front-, mid
