I ran the testsuite for an xtensa-elf target and it looks OK:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01243.html
There are a few failures but they are not regressions.
--Bob
Jim Wilson schrieb:
> Rainer Emrich wrote:
>> /SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/install/bin/ld:
>> unrecognized
>> option '-Wl,-rpath'
>
> This looks like PR 21206. See my explanation at the end. I see this on
> some of our FreeBSD machines, but I've never seen it on an IA-64 linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Wilson schrieb:
> Rainer Emrich wrote:
>> /SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/install/bin/ld:
>> unrecognized
>> option '-Wl,-rpath'
>
> This looks like PR 21206. See my explanation at the end. I see this on
> some of our FreeBSD mac
Rainer Emrich wrote:
/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/install/bin/ld: unrecognized
option '-Wl,-rpath'
This looks like PR 21206. See my explanation at the end. I see this on
some of our FreeBSD machines, but I've never seen it on an IA-64 linux
machine.
--
Jim Wilson, GNU To
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 02:09:43PM +0300, Grigory Zagorodnev wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
> >GCC 4.1.0 RC1 is here:
> >
> >ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.0-20060219
> >
> >Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
> >than the current SVN branch, so that we test
Hi!
My spec cpu2000 run shows 252.eon miscompared with i686-redhat-linux
4.1.0 20060221 (prerelease) compiler. Optimization level is -O2. Spec
reported "miscompare of pixels_out.kajiya".
Has anybody seen this before?
You should use -ffast-math for eon.
Paolo
On Feb 21, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Grigory Zagorodnev wrote:
Hi!
My spec cpu2000 run shows 252.eon miscompared with i686-redhat-linux
4.1.0 20060221 (prerelease) compiler. Optimization level is -O2. Spec
reported "miscompare of pixels_out.kajiya".
Has anybody seen this before?
Yes this is PR 323
Mark Mitchell wrote:
GCC 4.1.0 RC1 is here:
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.0-20060219
Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
than the current SVN branch, so that we test packaging, and other
similar issues.
If you find problems, please do not send me ema
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:45:15AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> except for the recently introduced test case
> FAIL: gcc.dg/20060218-1.c (test for errors, line 6)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/20060218-1.c (test for excess errors)
This one should be already fixed on gcc-4_1-branch (after RC1
was released I co
> One of the usual artifacts ...
Thanks. I've personally got them on Linux only, never ever on Solaris.
--
Eric Botcazou
Eric Botcazou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 21.02.2006 01:10:58:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01095.html
>
> FAIL: cc1010b
>
> Artifact or real failure?
One of the usual artifacts ...
Mit freundlichen Gruessen / Best Regards
Ulrich Weigand
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GN
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01095.html
FAIL: cc1010b
Artifact or real failure?
--
Eric Botcazou
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 18:34 -0500, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > one libstdc++ amd64 FAIL:
> >
> > FAIL: abi_check
>
> That is because you did not supply --enable-__cxa_atexit
> to configure. This has been mentioned so many times it
> might as we
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> GCC 4.1.0 RC1 is here:
>
> ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.0-20060219
Looking fine on s390-ibm-linux and s390x-ibm-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01094.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01095.html
except for the recent
On Feb 20, 2006, at 6:30 PM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
one libstdc++ amd64 FAIL:
FAIL: abi_check
That is because you did not supply --enable-__cxa_atexit
to configure. This has been mentioned so many times it
might as well enabled it by default for GNU/Linux.
-- Pinski
On Mon, 2006-02-20 at 19:40 +1100, Greg Schafer wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
>
> > Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
> > than the current SVN branch, so that we test packaging, and other
> > similar issues.
>
> Here it looks good so far on i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bootstrap failure in libjava on ia64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Failure in building jv-convert:
/bin/sh ./libtool --tag=GCJ --mode=link
/disk1/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linux/ia64-unknown-linux-gnu/gcc-4.1.0-RC1/gcc-4.1.0-RC1/gcc/gcj
- -B/disk1/SCRATCH/gcc-build/Linu
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Please download, build, and test. Please use these tarballs, rather
> than the current SVN branch, so that we test packaging, and other
> similar issues.
Here it looks good so far on i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-02/msg01036.html
Regards
Gr
18 matches
Mail list logo