Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking]

2007-12-03 Thread Olivier Galibert
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 04:16:17PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Have you got a chance to take a look at the materials? > If yes, what do you think on it? Nope, sorry, too busy with other things. OG.

Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking]

2007-12-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver. Have you got a chance to take a look at the materials? If yes, what do you think on it? Yours sincerely, George. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?: Thank you for your reply, Oliver. Briefly speaking the solution to the problems you have mentioned looks like this: 1. take a loot at the first pi

Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking]

2007-11-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your reply, Oliver. Briefly speaking the solution to the problems you have mentioned looks like this: 1. take a loot at the first picture here: http://docs.georgeshagov.com/twiki/tiki-index.php?page=Matrix+Linking+how+it+works 2. Pointer 1, 2... are vptrs 3. The idea is that each

Re: [Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking]

2007-11-23 Thread Olivier Galibert
On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:49:03AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Changing the _vptr or C equivalent dynamically] > I would like the community would have considered the idea. I am ready to > answer all the questions you might have. Changing the virtual function pointer dynamically using a seria

[Fwd: Re: FW: matrix linking]

2007-11-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I appreciate your reply, Joe. But I do not think this is off-topic, though. If we are going to discuss the details of your project, Ptolomy, right, then it would have been off-topic, I think. But I'm talking about GCC, therefore I believe this is the right place to post these ideas. What I am t

Re: FW: matrix linking

2007-11-19 Thread Joe Buck
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 09:33:16AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is this a thread safe operation for your Ptolomy project? > Should you suspend the application in order to load 'new classes' there? I answered this off-list, because it's off-topic.

RE: FW: matrix linking

2007-11-17 Thread george
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: FW: matrix linking On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:54:25PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have an invention which makes possible to brake through the barriers of > common software development. Nothing new here: add a level of indirection (or

Re: FW: matrix linking

2007-11-16 Thread Joe Buck
On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:54:25PM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have an invention which makes possible to brake through the barriers of > common software development. Nothing new here: add a level of indirection (or use C++ virtual functions), and dynamically load code. In the Ptolemy proj