I suspect it isn't matching pattern #2, because it couldn't get a QI
register, and instead it falls back to the general case of moving to a
normal register. I believe the gcc_assert should contain a check for
CONST_INT as well as a QI register or memory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PR
On Thursday 09 March 2006 18:04, Alan Lehotsky wrote:
> I've built a generic 4.1.0 for RH7.3 x86 linux (I did a make bootstrap)
>
> Compiling a rather large file, I get
>
> tmp.f_00.cxx:26432: error: unrecognizable insn:
> (insn 173 172 174 9 (set (reg:QI 122)
> (const_int 128 [0x80]))
