> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Guenther [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2012 4:58 PM
> To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Cc: Kumar, Venkataramanan
> Subject: Re: [i386] Question about Constraint Modifier character in smaxdf3
> pattern.
>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
>
>> Sphinx3 benchmark segmented when built and ran with -Ofast and
>> -fprefecth-loop-arrays.
>
> [...]
>
>> In my case the register 367 is sNAN.
>
>
> -Ofast implies -ffast-math which implies
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
Sphinx3 benchmark segmented when built and ran with -Ofast and
-fprefecth-loop-arrays.
[...]
In my case the register 367 is sNAN.
-Ofast implies -ffast-math which implies -ffinite-math-only:
Allow optimizations for floating-point arithme
