Hi!
On Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:30:47 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:05:55AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Is my understanding correct that the GCC policy regarding extensions such
> > as support for OpenACC or OpenMP 4 is: first develop and polish this on a
> > branch (s
Hi, Thomas!
>
> Unfortunately, even with that in place, I'm getting ICEs in LTO
> streaming (that is, the test cases specifying -flto GCC's testsuite),
> and also for trivial OpenACC code with -fopenacc, both for Fortran and
> C code.
This was fixed yesterday with exception of LTO which was not t
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 12:05:55AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Is my understanding correct that the GCC policy regarding extensions such
> as support for OpenACC or OpenMP 4 is: first develop and polish this on a
> branch (such as openacc-1_0-branch or gomp-4_0-branch), and once
> *everything*
