RE: [RFC] Rationale for passing vectors by value in SIMD registers

2016-07-17 Thread Matthew Fortune
Andrew Pinski writes: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Matthew Fortune > wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Matthew Fortune > >> wrote: > >> > MIPS is currently evaluating the benefit of using SIMD registers to pass > >> vector data by value. It is currently unclear how important it

Re: [RFC] Rationale for passing vectors by value in SIMD registers

2016-07-16 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:16 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Matthew Fortune >> wrote: >> > MIPS is currently evaluating the benefit of using SIMD registers to pass >> vector data by value. It is currently unclear how important it is for vector >> data >> to be pa

RE: [RFC] Rationale for passing vectors by value in SIMD registers

2014-02-15 Thread Matthew Fortune
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Matthew Fortune > wrote: > > MIPS is currently evaluating the benefit of using SIMD registers to pass > vector data by value. It is currently unclear how important it is for vector > data > to be passed in SIMD registers. I.e. the need for passing vector data by

Re: [RFC] Rationale for passing vectors by value in SIMD registers

2014-02-14 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:17 AM, Matthew Fortune wrote: > MIPS is currently evaluating the benefit of using SIMD registers to pass > vector data by value. It is currently unclear how important it is for vector > data to be passed in SIMD registers. I.e. the need for passing vector data by > val