On Thu, Feb 11 2016, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> No I think this is backwards it is the left half that shadows the next
> register and pieces are taken from the right. I've attempted a description
> below to see if it helps.
>
> I don't believe (in the MIPS case) we could unconditionally view the eve
Sorry for the slow response...
Andreas Arnez writes:
> On Mon, Jan 25 2016, Matthew Fortune wrote:
>
> > My dwarf knowledge is not brilliant but I have had to recently
> > consider it for MIPS floating point ABI changes aka FPXX and friends.
> > I don't know exactly where this fits in to your wh
On Mon, Jan 25 2016, Matthew Fortune wrote:
> My dwarf knowledge is not brilliant but I have had to recently consider
> it for MIPS floating point ABI changes aka FPXX and friends. I don't know
> exactly where this fits in to your whole description but in case it has
> a bearing on this we now hav
Andreas Arnez writes:
> 6 Summary of Open Questions
> ===
>
> 1. Out of the standard interpretations discussed under "options"
> (section 4) above, which do we want to settle on? Or is the
> "preferred" interpretation missing from that list?
> 2. Should piec
On Sat, Jan 16 2016, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> After analyzing some test case failures in GCC and GDB I realized that
>> there are various problems with the handling of DWARF pieces
>> (particularly from registers) in the current implementations of GCC and
>> GDB. I'm working on a fix for the GDB
> After analyzing some test case failures in GCC and GDB I realized that
> there are various problems with the handling of DWARF pieces
> (particularly from registers) in the current implementations of GCC and
> GDB. I'm working on a fix for the GDB part, but first I'd like to check
> whether I'm
