Matthew Fortune writes:
>> If you have time to benchmark it then let's go with whatever turns out best.
>
> I have already done some investigation (only with bare metal tools so
> far) and that shows that growing the frame downward almost universally
> improves code size. This is looking at the de
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
> Matthew Fortune writes:
> > I have been looking at using the FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD macro to
> change
> > the layout of a frame such that spill slots end up closer to the stack
> > pointer. This is useful as it leads to more spill/relo
Matthew Fortune writes:
> I have been looking at using the FRAME_GROWS_DOWNWARD macro to change
> the layout of a frame such that spill slots end up closer to the stack
> pointer. This is useful as it leads to more spill/reload instructions
> being encodable with 16bit instructions for mips16 and
