On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:00:38AM -0500, Michael N. Moran wrote:
> In embedded system work, and I'm sure in other circumstances,
> it is the case that "placement new" is the norm and destructors
> invoked explicitly (never on an abstract reference,) and the
> delete operator goes unused.
I shoul
Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
Karel Gardas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
class Foo
{
public:
virtual unsigned short
iiop_version() const = 0;
};
and when I compile it, GCC emits warning from subject, although this class
is really abstract and will never be instantiated. [...]
I guess GCC assu
* Jonathan Wakely:
> e.g. this is undefined behaviour:
>
> class Base {};
> class Derived : public Base {};
>
> Base* p = new Derived;
> delete p;
Wouldn't it make more sense to issue the warning at the point of the
delete, then?
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:51:42PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> > I would like to ask if the behaviour of GCC 4.0.0 20050301 is correct or
> > not. I have for example abstract base class like:
> >
> > class Foo
> > {
> > public:
> > virtual unsign
Karel Gardas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
> class Foo
> {
> public:
> virtual unsigned short
> iiop_version() const = 0;
> };
>
> and when I compile it, GCC emits warning from subject, although this class
> is really abstract and will never be instantiated. [...]
I guess GCC assu
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:51:42PM +0100, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I would like to ask if the behaviour of GCC 4.0.0 20050301 is correct or
> not. I have for example abstract base class like:
>
> class Foo
> {
> public:
> virtual unsigned short
> iiop_version() const = 0;
> };
>
> and when
On Friday 04 March 2005 15:51, Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I would like to ask if the behaviour of GCC 4.0.0 20050301 is correct or
> not. I have for example abstract base class like:
>
> class Foo
> {
> public:
> virtual unsigned short
> iiop_version() const = 0;
> };
hi Karel
Hello,
I would like to ask if the behaviour of GCC 4.0.0 20050301 is correct or
not. I have for example abstract base class like:
class Foo
{
public:
virtual unsigned short
iiop_version() const = 0;
};
and when I compile it, GCC emits warning from subject, although this class
is really
