On Feb 21, 2005, at 3:45 AM, Mile Davidovic wrote:
Functions are completely the same.
What is the reason for such compilere behaviour?
Just lack of code in the compiler to do better, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-08/msg00354.html for some of the
details and starting point, should you
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 12:45:51PM +0100, Mile Davidovic wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I have stupid question regarding constructors and destructors in c++.
> After compilation there are two assembler functions (__ZN4testC2Ev,
> __ZN4testC1Ev)
> that represent constructor, same is for destructors (__ZN
Hello all
I have stupid question regarding constructors and destructors in c++.
After compilation there are two assembler functions (__ZN4testC2Ev,
__ZN4testC1Ev)
that represent constructor, same is for destructors (__ZN4testD2Ev,
__ZN4testD1Ev).
Functions are completely the same.
What is the r
