On 15/05/2025 17:55, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 6:43 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
Question: Is there likely to be an
On 16/05/2025 01:23, Paul Koning wrote:
On May 15, 2025, at 8:06 PM, Oleg Endo via Gcc wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
upstreaming the existing A
> On May 15, 2025, at 8:06 PM, Oleg Endo via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>> Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
>>
>> I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
>> upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree por
Hi,
On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
>
> I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
> upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
>
> Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 6:43 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
> Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
>
> I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
> upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
>
> Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new "arc64"
Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new "arc64"
port in addition to the existing "arc" port?
At this point,
