Hi,
I think using a different arc64 port is better as the new ARCv3 comes
with some new innovations which are not in the "classical" arc port.
Moreover, the classical arc is implementing arcv1, arcv2 and all kinds
of variations in between. Adding a new 64bit architecture will just
complicate the e
On 15/05/2025 17:55, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 6:43 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
Question: Is there likely to be an
On 16/05/2025 01:23, Paul Koning wrote:
On May 15, 2025, at 8:06 PM, Oleg Endo via Gcc wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
upstreaming the existing A
> On May 15, 2025, at 8:06 PM, Oleg Endo via Gcc wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>> Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
>>
>> I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
>> upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree por
Hi,
On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
>
> I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
> upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
>
> Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 6:43 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote:
>
> Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
>
> I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
> upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
>
> Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new "arc64"
Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee,
I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for
upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1].
Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new "arc64"
port in addition to the existing "arc" port?
At this point,