Re: Question for maintainers: ARCv3 port feasibility

2025-05-19 Thread Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu via Gcc
Hi, I think using a different arc64 port is better as the new ARCv3 comes with some new innovations which are not in the "classical" arc port. Moreover, the classical arc is implementing arcv1, arcv2 and all kinds of variations in between. Adding a new 64bit architecture will just complicate the e

Re: Question for maintainers: ARCv3 port feasibility

2025-05-16 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 15/05/2025 17:55, Richard Biener wrote: On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 6:43 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote: Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee, I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1]. Question: Is there likely to be an

Re: Question for maintainers: ARCv3 port feasibility

2025-05-16 Thread Andrew Stubbs
On 16/05/2025 01:23, Paul Koning wrote: On May 15, 2025, at 8:06 PM, Oleg Endo via Gcc wrote: Hi, On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote: Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee, I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for upstreaming the existing A

Re: Question for maintainers: ARCv3 port feasibility

2025-05-15 Thread Paul Koning via Gcc
> On May 15, 2025, at 8:06 PM, Oleg Endo via Gcc wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote: >> Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee, >> >> I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for >> upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree por

Re: Question for maintainers: ARCv3 port feasibility

2025-05-15 Thread Oleg Endo via Gcc
Hi, On Thu, 2025-05-15 at 17:41 +0100, Andrew Stubbs wrote: > Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee, > > I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for > upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1]. > > Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new

Re: Question for maintainers: ARCv3 port feasibility

2025-05-15 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 6:43 PM Andrew Stubbs wrote: > > Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee, > > I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for > upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1]. > > Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new "arc64"

Question for maintainers: ARCv3 port feasibility

2025-05-15 Thread Andrew Stubbs
Dear GCC Maintainers and Steering Committee, I'm currently doing a feasibility study and effort estimate for upstreaming the existing ARCv3 out-of-tree port [1]. Question: Is there likely to be any objection to adding a new "arc64" port in addition to the existing "arc" port? At this point,