From: "Ben Elliston"
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:56 -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
Ah, but cake is only easy when someone else bakes it. :-)
While you're baking, Kaveh :-) could you see if your patch could also
fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34818
Thanks, Ben
I don't think
On Fri, 2009-04-10 at 23:56 -0400, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> Ah, but cake is only easy when someone else bakes it. :-)
While you're baking, Kaveh :-) could you see if your patch could also
fix:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34818
Thanks, Ben
"Kaveh R. GHAZI" writes:
> On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
>> Add a new shell variable in configure.ac extra_mpfr_configure_args. Set
>> it to what you want to pass to the mpfr configure. Call
>> AC_SUBST(extra_mpfr_configure_args). In Makefile.in add a line
>> EXTRA_MPFR_CONFIG
On Fri, 10 Apr 2009, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Add a new shell variable in configure.ac extra_mpfr_configure_args. Set
> it to what you want to pass to the mpfr configure. Call
> AC_SUBST(extra_mpfr_configure_args). In Makefile.in add a line
> EXTRA_MPFR_CONFIGURE_ARGS = @extra_mpfr_configure_a
"Kaveh R. GHAZI" writes:
> What I would like to see is that the extra_configure_flags for mpfr
> actually check whether gmp is being built in-tree before passing
> --with-gmp-build=foo to mpfr's configure. But I don't get how to do that.
> If the mpfr case could be fixed, I could then copy the m
I'm seeing an issue with the top level configure code. Looking at it
requires juggling m4, guile, shell and make syntax in one's head, I'm
having some trouble so I'm seeking some assistance.
I'm running into the actual problem when I'm integrating the mpc library
with GCC and testing in-tree buil
