Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 11:06 -0700, David Daney wrote:
I just did an unapproved commit to the svn repository (r105372) on the
theory that it is still a test repository.
This is permitted isn't it?
Sure.
One thing that happened is that all the bugzilla bugs th
On Thu, 2005-10-20 at 11:06 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> I just did an unapproved commit to the svn repository (r105372) on the
> theory that it is still a test repository.
>
> This is permitted isn't it?
Sure.
>
> One thing that happened is that all the bugzilla bugs that were
> referenced go
I just did an unapproved commit to the svn repository (r105372) on the
theory that it is still a test repository.
This is permitted isn't it?
One thing that happened is that all the bugzilla bugs that were
referenced got updated as well. But this is in the live bugzilla.
Did I do something
