> Note that merging the branch will be painful (as in, please dissect
> the branch into the individual patches again to make bisecting the
> trunk SVN possible). Also the SC vetoed these kind of 'integration'
> branches in the past (to not encourage starting an effective stage1
> on a branch).
I
NightStrike wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
I agree about the bisecting-in-case-of-bugs issue.
However, what I see happening in practice is that all GCC developers
keep on doing their development work on br
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 20:14 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Toon Moene wrote on Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:46:37PM CET:
> > Richard Guenther wrote:
> >>
> >> Note that merging the branch will be painful (as in, please dissect
> >> the branch into the individual patches again to make bisecting the
>
For some reason sourceware seems to think this message was sent as
HTML instead of plaint text. Retry...
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 8:15 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Proposed gfortran development branch
To: (hidden)
On Mar 19, 2009 8:06pm, Steve Kargl
* Toon Moene wrote on Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:46:37PM CET:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> Note that merging the branch will be painful (as in, please dissect
>> the branch into the individual patches again to make bisecting the
>> trunk SVN possible).
> I agree about the bisecting-in-case-of-bugs
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
> >
> > I agree about the bisecting-in-case-of-bugs issue.
> >
> > However, what I see happening in practice is that all GCC developers
> > keep on doing their development work on br
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:46:37PM +0100, Toon Moene wrote:
>
> I agree about the bisecting-in-case-of-bugs issue.
>
> However, what I see happening in practice is that all GCC developers
> keep on doing their development work on branches - only the gfortran
> developers are left out, because th
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:44 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
Hi folks,
In light of all the delays, I would like to propose that we create a
development / test branch for gfortran.
We could then start committing all the pending patches and if mainline
ever branches, just merg
