On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 09:14:51PM -0700, David Wohlferd wrote:
> >Abot the patches themselves... Hard to review again, sigh...
>
> I know, and I'm sorry.
>
> I just can't see any way to completely re-org the text without the patch
> becoming a nightmare. I was hoping the html links would make
On 10/20/2015 10:14 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
Abot the patches themselves... Hard to review again, sigh...
I know, and I'm sorry.
I just can't see any way to completely re-org the text without the patch
becoming a nightmare. I was hoping the html links would make that
easier, but I guess not
Abot the patches themselves... Hard to review again, sigh...
I know, and I'm sorry.
I just can't see any way to completely re-org the text without the patch
becoming a nightmare. I was hoping the html links would make that
easier, but I guess not. On the plus side, Explicit reg vars is the
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 03:06:19PM -0700, David Wohlferd wrote:
> But now it has annoyed someone who is willing to work on it.
And thanks for that :-)
> The current menu page has a couple of flaws:
>
> 1) It tries to condense the entire contents of the other 2 pages into a
> single paragraph ea
On 10/12/2015 04:06 PM, David Wohlferd wrote:
Note that there is nothing actually "wrong" with the existing text. It
does not provide inaccurate information or miss key details. The
problem is that (from a compiler user's point of view) the text is hard
to follow. It reads as though people just
Having updated the docs for Basic asm, Extended asm, and Asm Labels, I
am now sending my patches for the last of the inline asm sections:
Explicit Reg Vars.
My first attempt to update this got postponed (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02369.html). This patch
addresses the
