On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 08:59 +, Mick CORNUT wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> Ps: I've just tried with gcc 4.1.1, but the problem doesn't occur
> since gcc removes the temporary buffer allocation on the stack,
> furthermore, we want to keep gcc 3.4.x!
Changing the testcase to
void trace(int p1, int p2,
On 12 April 2007 10:10, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On 4/12/07, Mick CORNUT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> As I've mentionned it, I've built gcc 3.4.6 for ARM yesterday (with
>> binutils 2.17), and the same problem occurs!
>
> Andrew meant to say that GCC 3.4.* is no longer being ma
On 4/12/07, Mick CORNUT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Andrew,
As I've mentionned it, I've built gcc 3.4.6 for ARM yesterday (with
binutils 2.17), and the same problem occurs!
Andrew meant to say that GCC 3.4.* is no longer being maintained. You
should not post a bug, and if you do so anyway it
Please don't top-post.
Mick CORNUT writes:
> >
> > - Message d'origine
> > De : Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Mick CORNUT writes:
> >
> > > We've just pointed out a strange problem with gcc 3.4.0: we use it
> > > for generating ARM 7 processor thumb code. This str
t to
keep gcc 3.4.x!
- Message d'origine
De : Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
À : Mick CORNUT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé le : Jeudi, 12 Avril 2007, 10h40mn 53s
Objet : Re: Problem with gcc 3.4.0 & 3.4.6 in ARM thumb mode regarding sta
Mick CORNUT writes:
>
> We've just pointed out a strange problem with gcc 3.4.0: we use it
> for generating ARM 7 processor thumb code. This strange behavior
> was pointed out with a function taking 5 parameters (the fifth one
> is passed through stack according to the abi spec).
Can y
Hello everybody!
We've just pointed out a strange problem with gcc 3.4.0: we use it for
generating ARM 7 processor thumb code.
This strange behavior was pointed out with a function taking 5 parameters (the
fifth one is passed through stack according to the abi spec).
We use the following
