On Fri, 26 Sep 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > One related question: the __builtin_signbit is not type generic, is there
> > any reason for it not to be? Is there any reason for it not to be? I ask
>
> I guess history, builtins that were added earlier when we didn't have any
> typegeneric builti
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:07:28AM +0200, FX wrote:
> > Thus, the middle-end assumes that if you have __builtin_{isfinite,isnormal},
> > you also have __builtin_is{less,greater}equal builtins too.
>
> Many thanks to both of you! I wasn’t looking into the right place at all. I
> defined them, and
> Thus, the middle-end assumes that if you have __builtin_{isfinite,isnormal},
> you also have __builtin_is{less,greater}equal builtins too.
Many thanks to both of you! I wasn’t looking into the right place at all. I
defined them, and now it works.
One related question: the __builtin_signbit is
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:29:57AM +0200, FX wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m trying to make the Fortran front-end emit calls to some builtins we don’t
> currently use (isfinite, isnormal). However, trying to use the same code as
> isnan doesn’t work at all. Our gfc_define_builtin does three things:
>
>
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:29 AM, FX wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m trying to make the Fortran front-end emit calls to some builtins we don’t
> currently use (isfinite, isnormal). However, trying to use the same code as
> isnan doesn’t work at all. Our gfc_define_builtin does three things:
>
> decl = ad
Hi,
I’m trying to make the Fortran front-end emit calls to some builtins we don’t
currently use (isfinite, isnormal). However, trying to use the same code as
isnan doesn’t work at all. Our gfc_define_builtin does three things:
decl = add_builtin_function (name, type, code, BUILT_IN_NORMAL, li
