On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:59 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:19 PM Christoph Müllner via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:11 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > >
> > > On Jul 12, 2021, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> > >
> > > > * Why does the generic by-pieces infras
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:19 PM Christoph Müllner via Gcc
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:11 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 12, 2021, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> >
> > > * Why does the generic by-pieces infrastructure have a higher priority
> > > than the target-specific expansion
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 2:11 AM Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2021, Christoph Müllner wrote:
>
> > * Why does the generic by-pieces infrastructure have a higher priority
> > than the target-specific expansion via INSNs like setmem?
>
> by-pieces was not affected by the recent change, and
On Jul 12, 2021, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> * Why does the generic by-pieces infrastructure have a higher priority
> than the target-specific expansion via INSNs like setmem?
by-pieces was not affected by the recent change, and IMHO it generally
makes sense for it to have priority over setmem.
Hi,
I'm working on some platform-specific optimizations for
memset/memcpy/strcpy/strncpy.
However, I am having difficulties understanding how my code should be
integrated.
Initially, I got inspired by rs6000-string.c, where I see expansion
code for instructions
like setmemsi or cmpstrsi. However,
