On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Richard Günther
wrote:
> Adam Lewis wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Richard Biener
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Adam wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > When using -flto is there a way to tell gcc to not inline a
>>particular
>>> functio
Adam Lewis wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Richard Biener
>wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Adam wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > When using -flto is there a way to tell gcc to not inline a
>particular
>> function? attribute noinline appears to have no effect. I am using
>gcc
>> 4.
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 4:41 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Adam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When using -flto is there a way to tell gcc to not inline a particular
> > function? attribute noinline appears to have no effect. I am using gcc
> > 4.7.2. The use case is fo
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Adam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When using -flto is there a way to tell gcc to not inline a particular
> function? attribute noinline appears to have no effect. I am using gcc 4.7.2.
> The use case is for certain functions that cause optimization problems when
> they are
Hi,
When using -flto is there a way to tell gcc to not inline a particular
function? attribute noinline appears to have no effect. I am using gcc 4.7.2.
The use case is for certain functions that cause optimization problems when
they are inlined. An example is when the function is throwing a c+
