> Hi Rafael,
>
> I'm sorry I cannot try the patch until next weekend.
> However, from a first look, it should work but I wonder: if the first
> maybe_unlink_file fails the others are never reached, leaving some
> temporary files in place. Is this ok?
>
Yes, I talked with Diego and he thinks that t
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 13:59, Rafael Espindola wrote:
> 2009-11-23 Rafael Avila de Espindola
>
> * lto-wrapper.c (lto_wrapper_exit): Don't try to delete files if
> being called recursively.
OK.
Diego.
2009/11/22 Leandro Nini :
> Hi,
>
> in gcc-4.5 lto-wrapper may end up in an endless loop in case of error:
>
> if for example a 'maybe_unlink_file' call from 'lto_wrapper_exit' fails it
> calls 'fatal_perror' which in turn calls 'lto_wrapper_exit' again causing
> an infinity of
>
> lto-wrapper: del
Hi,
in gcc-4.5 lto-wrapper may end up in an endless loop in case of error:
if for example a 'maybe_unlink_file' call from 'lto_wrapper_exit' fails it
calls 'fatal_perror' which in turn calls 'lto_wrapper_exit' again causing
an infinity of
lto-wrapper: deleting LTRANS file /tmp/ccWjXUv8.lto.o: N
