Jim Wilson wrote:
> JoseD wrote:
> > @James
> > What do you mean by 16.3.3/3? GCC's version ?
>
> This is a reference to the ISO C standard.
No. It's a reference to the ISO C++ standard. 16.3.3/3
includes the sentence "If the result [of the ## operator] is
not a valid preprocessing token, the
JoseD wrote:
@James
What do you mean by 16.3.3/3? GCC's version ?
This is a reference to the ISO C standard.
Still don't see what the problem whith 2 tokens is...
The problem is the fact that they are 2 tokens. You can do a ## b to
create ab, but you can not do a ## ( to create a( becaus
e that there doesn't seem to be a consistent preprocessor spec.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Possible-bug-in-preprocessor-tf3494353.html#a9827482
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
JoseD wrote:
> Hi. Just wanted to share that the following macro gives an error on latest
> versions of GCC, but is reported to work on 2.95.3 (tested on MorphOS but
> should be the same for other OSses of course).
> Both an old version of SASC(AmigaOS) and Borland (on X86) worked fine.
>
> #inclu
a, b) a, b
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{ printf("%s %s\n", GETBRCKTELMNT((YYY, XXX)));
getchar();
return (0);
}
Regs
Jose
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Possible-bug-in-preprocessor-tf3494353.html#a9760061
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
((YYY, XXX)));
getchar();
return (0);
}
Regs
Jose
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Possible-bug-in-preprocessor-tf3494353.html#a9760061
Sent from the gcc - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
