Hello!
>
>> This is using the Polyhedron Fortran test.
>> http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/MFL6VW74649
>
>> Using several options, the gas_dyn test got much slower; however,
with
>> some options, the performance remained roughly the same.
>> In terms of the geometric mean, it is a slowdown of around 1%.
>> Result from http://www.suse.de/~gcctest/c++bench/polyhedron/
>> -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3 -ftree-vectorize -march= ??? (opteron
I
>> think).
>> 14.59s -> 21.06s (44% slower)
>
I will look into it right now, but at first glance it does not look like
this benchmark is built with the cost mod
Hello!
> This is using the Polyhedron Fortran test.
> http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/MFL6VW74649
> Using several options, the gas_dyn test got much slower; however, with
> some options, the performance remained roughly the same.
> In terms of the geometric mean, it is a slowdown of around 1%.
> The
This is using the Polyhedron Fortran test.
http://www.polyhedron.co.uk/MFL6VW74649
Using several options, the gas_dyn test got much slower; however, with
some options, the performance remained roughly the same.
In terms of the geometric mean, it is a slowdown of around 1%.
The run time of the othe
