Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html

2009-06-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Dennis Clarke wrote: > > How did you do with the new PPL bits ? That went smoothly ? >> > They're not mandatory for 4.4.x so I've simply ignored them for now. ah .. how very tricky of you :-) Dennis

Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html

2009-06-10 Thread Tom Christensen
Dennis Clarke wrote: > How did you do with the new PPL bits ? That went smoothly ? They're not mandatory for 4.4.x so I've simply ignored them for now. -tgc

Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html

2009-06-10 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Dennis Clarke wrote: >> Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html >> >> I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw >> that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen. >> >> All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person : >> > > You bette

Re: Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html

2009-06-09 Thread Tom Christensen
Dennis Clarke wrote: Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen. All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person : You better get cracking on 4.4

Please update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html

2009-06-08 Thread Dennis Clarke
Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.3/buildstat.html I was looking for testsuite results to compare with on Solaris and I saw that nearly every report for GCC 4.3.3 was done by Tom G. Christensen. All GCC 4.3.3 reports on Solaris from one person : i386-pc-solaris2.6 Test results: 4.3.3 i3