Re: Please block seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com from gcc-regression

2016-04-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 04:30:45PM +, Joseph Myers wrote: >On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote: > >> We're sorry for the problems. Bill was updating our scripts to enable the >> gcc-6-branch for testing, and unfortunately things went massively wrong. >> This has been shut down, and we're t

Re: Please block seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com from gcc-regression

2016-04-19 Thread Joseph Myers
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016, Bill Schmidt wrote: > We're sorry for the problems. Bill was updating our scripts to enable the > gcc-6-branch for testing, and unfortunately things went massively wrong. > This has been shut down, and we're taking several precautions to ensure > nothing like this happens aga

Re: Please block seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com from gcc-regression

2016-04-19 Thread Bill Seurer
On 04/19/16 04:56, Joseph Myers wrote: In the past few days, seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com has sent half a gigabyte of huge messages such as to gcc-regression, those messages containing no actual useful information about regressions caused

Please block seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com from gcc-regression

2016-04-19 Thread Joseph Myers
In the past few days, seu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com has sent half a gigabyte of huge messages such as to gcc-regression, those messages containing no actual useful information about regressions caused by GCC commits. Overseers, could yo