On 2/2/25 11:09 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Hi,
I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
Maybe the limits can be increased a bit, sometimes patches
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 11:06, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
>
> Am 03.02.25 um 11:02 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
> > The problem is, as always spam... Do you find the current limit (400K)
> > restricts you often from fast posting to the gcc-patches list?
>
> It happens every now and then, when the patche
Am 03.02.25 um 11:02 schrieb Mark Wielaard:
The problem is, as always spam... Do you find the current limit (400K)
restricts you often from fast posting to the gcc-patches list?
It happens every now and then, when the patches (as this one) are really
big.
(Does anybody actually look at the me
On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 10:55:10AM +, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 10:27, Marc Poulhiès wrote:
> >
> > I usually look at the queue a few times a day (working day)... So at least
> > in my case, I may not be very active during the weekends (even less so this
> > weeke
On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 at 10:27, Marc Poulhiès wrote:
>
> I usually look at the queue a few times a day (working day)... So at least in
> my case, I may not be very active during the weekends (even less so this
> weekend)...
> As for unlocking too-big patches, I happen to accept the ones that are
>
February 3, 2025 at 11:02 AM, "Mark Wielaard" mailto:m...@klomp.org?to=%22Mark%20Wielaard%22%20%3Cmark%40klomp.org%3E > wrote:
> > (Does anybody actually look at the messages, as promised in the e-mail?=
> >
> I think it is done multiple times each day. The current moderators are
> Jeff and Marc,
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 07:09:14PM +0100, Thomas Koenig via Gcc wrote:
> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
> was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
I think that was done
On Feb 02 2025, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
> was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
The mail has been accepted anyway:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/g
On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 9:55 AM Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, 2 Feb 2025, 18:10 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
>> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
>> was too large. and that
On Sun, 2 Feb 2025, 18:10 Thomas Koenig via Gcc, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
> to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
> was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
>
> Maybe the limits can be increased a
Hi,
I sent https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2025-February/061670.html
to gcc-patches also, as normal, but got back an e-mail that it
was too large. and that a moderator would look at it.
Maybe the limits can be increased a bit, sometimes patches can
be quite large, especially if they contai
11 matches
Mail list logo
