On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, FX wrote:
> find failures of c99-stdint-1.c, it means the mingw headers need fixing (I'm
> particularly worried about int_fast8_t, which is "char" rather than "signed
> char", and I suspect this could spell trouble).
These types being plain "char" fails to conform to C99, but
Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2009/4/4 Danny Smith :
>> in "mingw-stdint.h" for sanity reason. I will need Kai's help on 32/64
>> bit #ifdefs
> Thanks for the patch. Are those defines really just for default target
> necessary? Shouldn't be the defines target dependent? Something like
> '#define UINTPTR_T
2009/4/4 Danny Smith :
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Please find attached a patch I built to add stdint-related
>> information
>> to GCC configuration for the mingw target (see
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg0.html
>> for more details about why).
>
> Thanks for this. I am just in the process of
> Hi all,
>
> Please find attached a patch I built to add stdint-related
> information
> to GCC configuration for the mingw target (see
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg0.html
> for more details about why).
Thanks for this. I am just in the process of doning a testsuite run on e
Hi all,
Please find attached a patch I built to add stdint-related information
to GCC configuration for the mingw target (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg0.html
for more details about why). I built it from looking at the mingw
headers, because I have them on my laptop, I'm in a
