Re: Patch for PR15832 and PR28071

2006-07-26 Thread Vladimir Makarov
Jan Hubicka wrote: Perhaps you was just hitting bug in reg-stack concerning partially initialized vars that was later fixed independently or am I missing something? I think your are right. That was added because of the bug in reg-stack. If removing the code for stack regs in global.c does n

Patch for PR15832 and PR28071

2006-07-26 Thread Jan Hubicka
Vladimir, I've run into problem with your patch for PR15832 on the testcase PR rtl-optimization/28071. Bug2.c compiled with -O3 -fno-tree-pre -fno-tree-fre it needs about 200MB extra memory for bitmaps because the bitmap stack_regs ends up very dense and it is copied indo all the pavins. (I have c