Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
>>> I would update the recommended version to 2.3.0 and fail for anything less
>>> than 2.2.1.
> Ok, here's my patch. Since we may have some developers still using 2.2.0,
> I'll wait say a week after approval before installing to give them time to
> upgrade.
> Ok for mainl
On Sun, 9 Dec 2007, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > I would update the recommended version to 2.3.0 and fail for anything less
> > than 2.2.1.
>
> I agree. Not optimizing bessel functions as builtins doesn't bother me
> too much, but we might as well move past the buggy versi
