On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 10:37 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You would not want a lawyer designing a compiler, so why...
>
Oh.
I guess i'll just hang up my hat then ...
You would not want a lawyer designing a compiler, so why...
Honestly, this is not helping. This is a technological forum and this
is not a technological issue but a legal one. So, even if you knew a
lawyer who wishes to help and work with the FSF to address the legal
issue, this is not the right m
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 03:10:28PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> To give it a bit more legal bite
There are no lawyers on this list (that I'm aware of). If you want to
discuss this, please contact the FSF or SC directly instead. It does
no good here.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery
To give it a bit more legal bite with respect to ruling out accidental
infringement, I suppose the passphrase could include a statement that
assures that the sending program is licensed under the GPL.
Another thing is that if it is considered possible that the passphrase
an be distributed as a sep
