On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 9:55 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:>
> On 6/4/19 1:07 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On June 4, 2019 6:50:07 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew MacLeod
> > wrote:
> >> On 6/4/19 11:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>
> >>> where the single(!) query of the range of i on the alloca call
> >>> will
On 6/4/19 4:21 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM A
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
The above sugges
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
The above suggests that iff this is done at all it is not
On 6/4/19 1:07 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On June 4, 2019 6:50:07 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 6/4/19 11:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
where the single(!) query of the range of i on the alloca call
will populate N BBs caches with the Nth having ranges for
all SSA defs of i running in
On June 4, 2019 6:50:07 PM GMT+02:00, Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
>On 6/4/19 11:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:26 PM Richard Biener
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> But you still have a reference to the range in evry BB dominated by
>the
>>> definition?
>> Btw, I was thinking of
>>
>> unsig
On 6/4/19 11:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:26 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
But you still have a reference to the range in evry BB dominated by the
definition?
Btw, I was thinking of
unsigned char foo(long);
void baz(unsigned char c)
{
try{
long i = c;
i +
On 6/4/19 11:26 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:40 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
T
On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 5:26 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:40 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >
> > On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
> > > wrote:
> > >> On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >>> On Fri, May
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 5:40 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >> On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >>> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod
> >>> wrote:
> > The above sugges
On 5/31/19 6:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/31/19 2:26 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/31/19 2:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
stmt-level tracking of ranges are sometimes important. This is
something the machinery cannot provide - correct? At least not
optimistic
On 5/31/19 2:26 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 5/31/19 2:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
stmt-level tracking of ranges are sometimes important. This is
something the machinery cannot provide - correct? At least not
optimistically enough with rang
On 5/31/19 2:16 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
The above suggests t
On 5/31/19 9:40 AM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod
>> wrote:
>>> On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod
wrote:
>> The above suggests that iff this i
On 5/29/19 7:15 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
The above suggests that iff this is done at all it is not in GORI because
those are not conditional
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 4:17 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >>
> >>> The above suggests that iff this is done at all it is not in GORI because
> >>> those are not conditional stmts or ranges from f
On 5/27/19 9:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
The above suggests that iff this is done at all it is not in GORI because
those are not conditional stmts or ranges from feeding those. The
machinery doing the use-def walking from stmt context al
On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 5:50 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> On 5/23/19 8:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:28 AM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >>
> >> 2 * GORI
> >>
> >> The second component is the “Generates Outgoing Range Info” engine.
> >> This is a basic-block or
On 5/23/19 8:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:28 AM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
2 * GORI
The second component is the “Generates Outgoing Range Info” engine.
This is a basic-block oriented component which determines what ssa-names
have ranges created on outgoing edg
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 3:28 AM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> *This note will talk about the 4 major components of the prototype and
> explain how they work together. I will be fairly light on detail just
> to give an overview, we can delve into whatever details are needed.
> - Range-ops : Range ope
*This note will talk about the 4 major components of the prototype and
explain how they work together. I will be fairly light on detail just
to give an overview, we can delve into whatever details are needed.
- Range-ops : Range operations at the statement level
- GORI - Generates Outgoing Ran
21 matches
Mail list logo
