Re: Object attribute tagging

On Jun 18, 2007, at 6:50 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote: Any comments on either the general approach or the details? Sounds fine to me. In mips land we were previously using named sections to solve this, but as long as the approach allows arbitrarily long sets of attributes I think it sounds g

RE: Object attribute tagging

On 19 June 2007 02:50, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > Any comments on either the general approach or the details? Sounds like a sane design to me :) cheers, DaveK -- Can't think of a witty .sigline today

Re: Object attribute tagging

On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 01:50 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > The ARM EABI says that only standard entries under "aeabi" should affect > link-compatibility of object files, not vendor entries such as "gnu", but > in the absence of corresponding standards for other processors I don't > think we can

Re: Object attribute tagging

On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 01:50:27AM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > The question was raised a while back on the gcc-patches and gdb-patches > lists of how GCC should tag objects with some ABI information for the use > of GDB, noting that various different methods have been in use >

Object attribute tagging

The question was raised a while back on the gcc-patches and gdb-patches lists of how GCC should tag objects with some ABI information for the use of GDB, noting that various different methods have been in use . Mark suggested