> Benjamin Kosnik writes:
>> My patch to fix this isn't at all obvious that it is correct to me.
>> There are no signs that it will be reviewed anytime soon,
Benjamin> That's because you've buried it in an SOS message about bootstrap
Benjamin> breaking.
Benjamin> Please post your patch o
> My patch to fix this isn't at all obvious that it is correct to me.
> There are no signs that it will be reviewed anytime soon,
That's because you've buried it in an SOS message about bootstrap
breaking.
Please post your patch on gcc-patches with a sane and descriptive
subject, and put also
On Jul 11, 2006, at 10:58 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
I don't know what to do about the ICE: it looks like Mike has a patch.
My patch to fix this isn't at all obvious that it is correct to me.
There are no signs that it will be reviewed anytime soon, so, I'd say
please revert the patch that
> See PR 28290 (the errors) and PR 28217 (the ICE). Both were reported
> before the actual
> bootstrap issue.
Paolo's patch for 28290 is now in.
I don't know what to do about the ICE: it looks like Mike has a patch.
Temporary workaround is to configure with --disable-libstdcxx-pch.
-benjamin
On Jul 11, 2006, at 8:51 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Is it possible the new bootstrap failure (log below) I started seeing
within the last 24 hours is related to the following patch?
This is not that new, in fact the only reason why Ben's patch exposes
it is because
it was make was not stopp
Is it possible the new bootstrap failure (log below) I started seeing
within the last 24 hours is related to the following patch?
2006-07-10 Benjamin Kosnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR libstdc++/15448
* include/Makefile.am: Clean up pch rules.
* include/Makefile.in: Regener
