On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 08:19 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 07:52:27PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'm not yet familiar with the details of the gcc GC, but it appears that
> > GTY() annotations are preprocessed to generate traversal code used by a
> > mark-and-swe
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:19:17 +0200
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> You could just:
> #include "ggc.h"
>
> static void my_walker (void *arg ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> {
> /* Ignore argument, as it is dummy */
> /* Walk all the still live python objects here and if they reference
> GCC GC objects, call
>
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:33 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> I've been working on a new plugin for GCC, which supports embedding
> Python within GCC, exposing GCC's internal data structures as Python
> objects and classes.
>
> The plugin links against libpython, and (I hope) allows you to invoke
> arbi
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 17:51:52 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
>
> FWIW, I think I disagree with some of the above. For me, one of the
> core "ideas" behind python is that syntax matters a great deal - code is
> read more times than it's written, so the readability of code to humans
> is important. Wh
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:31 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > When I mentioned the garbage collector, I was merely trying to convey
> > the early, buggy nature of my code. This is a bug that I need to fix,
> > but not a fundamental
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 22:30 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > I'm aware of MELT - as I understand it, it's a Lisp variant.
>
> Yes. However, I do have in the works an infix syntax of MELT called
> MILT. But it would just be an infix
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> When I mentioned the garbage collector, I was merely trying to convey
> the early, buggy nature of my code. This is a bug that I need to fix,
> but not a fundamental design flaw (I hope!)
I would be very interested in understanding in de
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:34:51 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> I'm aware of MELT - as I understand it, it's a Lisp variant.
Yes. However, I do have in the works an infix syntax of MELT called
MILT. But it would just be an infix/prefix syntax of exactly the same
language (more precisely, of a large sub
On Tue, 2011-06-21 at 21:02 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:33:20 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> > It's still at the "experimental proof-of-concept stage"; expect crashes
> > and tracebacks (I'm new to the insides of GCC, and I may have
> > misunderstood things. I'm en
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 14:33:20 -0400
David Malcolm wrote:
> It's still at the "experimental proof-of-concept stage"; expect crashes
> and tracebacks (I'm new to the insides of GCC, and I may have
> misunderstood things. I'm entirely ignoring the garbage collector, and
> I've also used a few entrypo
I've been working on a new plugin for GCC, which supports embedding
Python within GCC, exposing GCC's internal data structures as Python
objects and classes.
The plugin links against libpython, and (I hope) allows you to invoke
arbitrary Python scripts from inside a compile. My aim is to allow
pe
11 matches
Mail list logo
