Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-04-14 Thread Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 22:54, Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, pawel k. via Gcc wrote: > > > My best guess is if we could hookify all target code everything callable > > either from frontends or midend, we could try to severly cut this estimate. > > That's a 700-patch series (there are

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-04-14 Thread Joseph Myers
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021, pawel k. via Gcc wrote: > My best guess is if we could hookify all target code everything callable > either from frontends or midend, we could try to severly cut this estimate. That's a 700-patch series (there are about 700 target macros). For every target macro, it's neces

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-04-13 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hello, Sorry for slight delay. Very happy if i could prepare prototype of this solution. My best guess is if we could hookify all target code everything callable either from frontends or midend, we could try to severly cut this estimate. I also went back to thread you memtioned, i underestimated

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-29 Thread Joseph Myers
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021, pawel k. via Gcc wrote: > Hello, > I would like to ask whether there would be interest in the project to be > able to build a single binary of gcc where target would be selectable with > option flags ie more than one target could be included and aimed for by > single binary. >

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-28 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hello, Ok fair enough. I thought cleaner separation of FE and generics interface would be useful feature. It would make adding new FE easier too hopefully. We could provide either multiple FEs per binary or not. Additionally, In single FE per binary option of my fegens cleanup scenario we could av

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-28 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hello, Yea ok got it. Ill reply. I dont get email notifications from him. Ill prepare reply asap as of what we can or cannot do and what will be costs and benefits. Then he/you can decide. Best regards, Pawel niedz., 28.03.2021, 11:34 użytkownik Jonathan Wakely napisał: > > > On Sun, 28 Mar 20

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-28 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021, 02:20 pawel k., wrote: > Hmm, > Thanks. Not sure I can see answer from him. Ill recheck it. > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-March/235079.html

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-27 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hmm, Thanks. Not sure I can see answer from him. Ill recheck it. Best regards, Pawel Kunio niedz., 28.03.2021, 01:27 użytkownik Jonathan Wakely napisał: > > > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021, 23:38 pawel k. via Gcc, wrote: > >> Hello, >> I would like to ask whether there would be interest in the project

Re: My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Sat, 27 Mar 2021, 23:38 pawel k. via Gcc, wrote: > Hello, > I would like to ask whether there would be interest in the project to be > able to build a single binary of gcc where target would be selectable with > option flags ie more than one target could be included and aimed for by > single b

My 2nd attempt to devel for gcc

2021-03-27 Thread pawel k. via Gcc
Hello, I would like to ask whether there would be interest in the project to be able to build a single binary of gcc where target would be selectable with option flags ie more than one target could be included and aimed for by single binary. If so i could try myself at adding such feature to gcc.