> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:15:53PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>> OUCH.
>>
>> Some of the types in question are probably not used in the program
>> -- they are there for debugging. It's disturbing to see this sort
>> of
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 04:15:53PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> OUCH.
>
> Some of the types in question are probably not used in the program --
> they are there for debugging. It's disturbing to see this sort of
> incompatibility.
-fno-eliminate-unused-debug-types?
> The rule for "used" clearly
> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Daniel> On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:53:35PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
>> I'm doing some tests to see if 4.0.0 will improve our debug
>> experience, which is mixed indeed with complex C++ code and 3.3.3.
>>
>> So far it looks like
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 03:53:35PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> I'm doing some tests to see if 4.0.0 will improve our debug
> experience, which is mixed indeed with complex C++ code and 3.3.3.
>
> So far it looks like things are MUCH worse. I built my application
> and looked at it with GDB. Many
I'm doing some tests to see if 4.0.0 will improve our debug
experience, which is mixed indeed with complex C++ code and 3.3.3.
So far it looks like things are MUCH worse. I built my application
and looked at it with GDB. Many of the structure names are missing.
I did some checking with readelf,
