On Wed, 2013-07-31 at 08:19 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> The first, I think. Or more specifically, we need to do this whenever
> -mabicalls is used, rather than just when addressing!=absolute.
> Could you give the patch below a try?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
That patch fixed the problem.
Stev
Steve Ellcey writes:
> On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 20:32 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Steve Ellcey " writes:
>> > I have noticed that gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-7.c and
>> > gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-8.c fail when running the GCC
>> > testsuite with -msoft-float.
>>
>> Which configuration and te
On Tue, 2013-07-30 at 20:32 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Steve Ellcey " writes:
> > I have noticed that gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-7.c and
> > gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-8.c fail when running the GCC
> > testsuite with -msoft-float.
>
> Which configuration and test options are you using and w
"Steve Ellcey " writes:
> I have noticed that gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-7.c and
> gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-8.c fail when running the GCC
> testsuite with -msoft-float.
Which configuration and test options are you using and what failure do
you see? It works for me with mipsisa64-elf, so it sound
Richard,
I have noticed that gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-7.c and
gcc.target/mips/fpr-moves-8.c fail when running the GCC
testsuite with -msoft-float. I think it is because
of this code in mips.exp:
if { [mips_using_mips16_p options]
&& ![mips_same_option_p $abi "-mabi=32"]
