On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 02:13:12PM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Anyone have any thoughts or opinions? This may have impact on a
> number of things, including any pointer alignment analysis.
MEM_ALIGN has code to deal with this. There's no reason you can't
apply that to TYPE_ALIGN.
I suspect
On Jul 22, 2005, at 1:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
Understood. I'm just looking for the minimum type alignment without
user alignment. It appears that this is impossible to get from the
targets, due to the way the targets can
On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
struct X { int A; double B; };
This is modified by things like ADJUST_FIELD_ALIGN and
ROUND_TYPE_ALIGN. As such, I don't think there is a way to get this
alignment in a target-independent way. Does that sound right?
You want the alignment
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Chris Lattner wrote:
> Understood. I'm just looking for the minimum type alignment without
> user alignment. It appears that this is impossible to get from the
> targets, due to the way the targets can override type alignments in
> (almost completel
> > I'm having a hard time with the simplicity of your question:
> > ? Certainly, I don't expect that to answer your question, but I
> > don't understand why.
>
> The problem I am running into is that the double in this struct is
> only 4-byte aligned on darwin:
>
> struct X { int A; double
On Jul 22, 2005, at 12:33 PM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Friday, July 22, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
I'm trying to determine (in target-independent code) what the
*minimum* target alignment of a type is. For example, on darwin,
double's are normally 4-byte aligned, but are 8-byte a
On Friday, July 22, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
I'm trying to determine (in target-independent code) what the
*minimum* target alignment of a type is. For example, on darwin,
double's are normally 4-byte aligned, but are 8-byte aligned in some
cases (e.g. when they are the first el
On Jul 22, 2005, at 11:27 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
On Jul 22, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
I'm trying to determine (in target-independent code) what the
*minimum* target alignment of a type is. For example, on darwin,
double's are normally 4-byte aligned, but are 8-byte aligned
On Jul 22, 2005, at 11:07 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
Hi All,
I'm trying to determine (in target-independent code) what the
*minimum* target alignment of a type is. For example, on darwin,
double's are normally 4-byte aligned, but are 8-byte aligned in some
cases (e.g. when they are the firs
Hi All,
I'm trying to determine (in target-independent code) what the
*minimum* target alignment of a type is. For example, on darwin,
double's are normally 4-byte aligned, but are 8-byte aligned in some
cases (e.g. when they are the first element of a struct). TYPE_ALIGN
on a double r
10 matches
Mail list logo
