Ralf Corsepius writes:
> Pardon, there seems to be a misunderstanding. I only was surprised to see
> FreeBSD shipping much newer versions of packages than most Linux distros
> (even those who claim to be "(b)leading edge").
If you want to have the bleading edge you need to look at something like
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I do see that FreeBSD Ports has mpfr 2.4.1. How advanced of them.
Amazing :-()
It's possible I am missing something here. According to
http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/ (reachable from http://www.mpfr.org/
by fo
On Fri, 27 Mar 2009, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> I do see that FreeBSD Ports has mpfr 2.4.1. How advanced of them.
> Amazing :-()
It's possible I am missing something here. According to
http://www.mpfr.org/mpfr-current/ (reachable from http://www.mpfr.org/
by following "Latest release") this is the
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 15:21 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > libbackend.a(builtins.o): In function `fold_builtin_1':
> > ../../trunk/gcc/builtins.c:10319: undefined reference to `mpfr_j0'
> > ../../trunk/gcc/builtins.c:10325: undefined reference to `
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> libbackend.a(builtins.o): In function `fold_builtin_1':
> ../../trunk/gcc/builtins.c:10319: undefined reference to `mpfr_j0'
> ../../trunk/gcc/builtins.c:10325: undefined reference to `mpfr_j1'
> ../../trunk/gcc/builtins.c:10331: undefined reference to
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 14:37 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > /home/guerby/build-ppl/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/guerby/build-ppl/./prev-gcc/
> > -B/n/17/guerby/install-trunk-ppl/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -g -O2
> > -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-stri
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> /home/guerby/build-ppl/./prev-gcc/xgcc -B/home/guerby/build-ppl/./prev-gcc/
> -B/n/17/guerby/install-trunk-ppl/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -g -O2
> -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wcast-qual -Wold-st
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 00:48 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, David Edelsohn wrote:
>
> > > If you're able to compile and install GCC on a system then my experience
> > > is that configuring and installing GMP and MPFR from .tar.gz is hassle
> > > free (you must use --disable-sh
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > If you're able to compile and install GCC on a system then my experience
> > is that configuring and installing GMP and MPFR from .tar.gz is hassle
> > free (you must use --disable-shared on both) and does not take very long
> > relative to GCC bootst
From: "Steven Bosscher"
The problem doesn't happen on machines I own or have root access to.
It's only a problem when you try to do gcc development on machines
hosted by 3rd parties (SF compile farm, HP cluster, machines at places
where I work and/or where I try to convince people to use gfortr
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 20:58 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
>> > Steven Bosscher wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> If there are
On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 20:58 +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> > Steven Bosscher wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> If there are no objections, I'll create a patch.
> >>
> >> P... for those
Steven Bosscher wrote:
The problem doesn't happen on machines I own or have root access to.
It's only a problem when you try to do gcc development on machines
hosted by 3rd parties (SF compile farm, HP cluster, machines at places
where I work and/or where I try to convince people to use gfortran
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Toon Moene wrote:
> Steven Bosscher wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> If there are no objections, I'll create a patch.
>>
>> P... for those of us who just install the latest-and-greatest
>> fedora/suse/ubuntu/... on
Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll create a patch.
P... for those of us who just install the latest-and-greatest
fedora/suse/ubuntu/... once and don't change installations for two or
three years (stable machine,
From: "Joe Buck"
Debian stable, and Ubuntu Hardy (most recent LTS release) have 2.3.1.
Same with OpenSUSE 11.0. So I think 2.3.1 is typical of current stable
releases; Fedora tends to be bleeding edge and not typical.
I still have to deal with older distros (e.g. RHEL 4), but it's
already nec
Joe Buck wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:11:04PM -0700, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Tim Prince wrote:
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
your typical development box and how old are your distros?
For the RTEMS Project machines we try to stay
on fairly recent Fedora
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 05:11:04PM -0700, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Tim Prince wrote:
> > Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> >
> >
> >> What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
> >> your typical development box and how old are your distros?
> >>
> >>
> For the RTEMS Project machines we try to stay
> on fairly re
Tim Prince wrote:
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
your typical development box and how old are your distros?
For the RTEMS Project machines we try to stay
on fairly recent Fedora versions. All our internal GCC
test machines are Fedora 9 or 10 and 10 has
Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> What versions of GMP/MPFR do you get on
> your typical development box and how old are your distros?
>
OpenSuSE 10.3 (originally released Oct. 07):
gmp-devel-4.2.1-58
gmp-devel-32bit-4.2.1-58
mpfr-2.2.1-45
From: "Steven Bosscher"
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi
wrote:
If there are no objections, I'll create a patch.
P... for those of us who just install the latest-and-greatest
fedora/suse/ubuntu/... once and don't change installations for two or
three years (stable machin
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
> If there are no objections, I'll create a patch.
P... for those of us who just install the latest-and-greatest
fedora/suse/ubuntu/... once and don't change installations for two or
three years (stable machine, etc.) it becomes increasi
Hi,
I'd like to open the issue of minimum GMP/MPFR versions for gcc-4.5. We
currently require gmp-4.1 and mpfr-2.3.0 to build GCC.
Part of my motivation is that MPC requires more recent versions of these
packages. But also older GMP/MPFR have known bugs and I'd like to encourage
upgrading
23 matches
Mail list logo
