On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> As others noted, MetaHTML can be made to work on a current GNU/Linux
> system, and while this probably will not be our long term strategy, I
> am trying to brush up my scripts/patches that will allow for this more
> easily and then share this with you an
Hi FX,
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> how was metahtml compiled for the current webserver (the error I see
> is certainly not target-specific), and should we use a tool that has
> been deceased for 8 years to produce our website?
let me provide a bit of historical backgroun
On 28 September 2007 18:07, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>> On 28 September 2007 17:10, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
>>> PS: The compilation error I get, if that rings a bell to someone who
>>> installed metahtml on the webserver, is in libmhtml:
>> so maybe try escaping the line ends
Dave Korn wrote:
On 28 September 2007 17:10, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
PS: The compilation error I get, if that rings a bell to someone who
installed metahtml on the webserver, is in libmhtml:
Compiling pagefuncs.c into pagefuncs.o
gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -g -DHAVE_CON
On 28 September 2007 17:10, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:
> PS: The compilation error I get, if that rings a bell to someone who
> installed metahtml on the webserver, is in libmhtml:
>
> Compiling pagefuncs.c into pagefuncs.o
> gcc -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wshadow -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.
Hi all,
I'm currently rewriting the fortran/ part of the GCC website and
trying to use the website preprocessor locally, to check my
modifications (which include bringing fortran/ to the website common
style). The script needs mhc, which seems to be the metahtml
compiler. I tried to compile metaht
