Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions

2005-10-12 Thread Andrew Pinski
On Oct 12, 2005, at 9:49 AM, Adriaan van Os wrote: Mark Mitchell wrote: As previously announced, here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00093.html the mainline is now subject to the usual release-branch rules: only fixes for regressions. The development rules at

Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions

2005-10-12 Thread Adriaan van Os
Mark Mitchell wrote: As previously announced, here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00093.html the mainline is now subject to the usual release-branch rules: only fixes for regressions. The development rules at use the word "bug", not the word "

Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions

2005-10-10 Thread Mark Mitchell
Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Monday 10 October 2005 19:35, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>As previously announced, here: >> >>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00093.html >> >>the mainline is now subject to the usual release-branch rules: only >>fixes for regressions. > > > How does this affect gfor

Re: Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions

2005-10-10 Thread Steven Bosscher
On Monday 10 October 2005 19:35, Mark Mitchell wrote: > As previously announced, here: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00093.html > > the mainline is now subject to the usual release-branch rules: only > fixes for regressions. How does this affect gfortran, and what about already posted b

Mainline now closed to all changes which do not fix regressions

2005-10-10 Thread Mark Mitchell
As previously announced, here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-10/msg00093.html the mainline is now subject to the usual release-branch rules: only fixes for regressions. The goal is to quickly reduce the current 219 oustanding regressions against 4.1 to approximately 100 -- in part by me retarge