On 3/9/20 11:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:46:31AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Hi Thomas, hi Overseers
I can confirm that those are stripped off!
I did sent an email with three attachments:
* test.txt (text/plain)
* test.diff (text/x-diff)
* the company's disclaimer
T
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 10:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 6) there used to be a Raw text URL to grab the raw email, now there is nothing
Based on info from #overseers ...
While you can't download the raw text of an individual email now, you
can get the entire month's mail in a compressed archive, from
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 19:57, Thomas König wrote:
> As far as the advantages go: A per-thread view is nice, but I don't
> think having it outweighs the disadvantages above.
We always had a threaded view:
https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-bugs/2020-03/threads.html
It just wasn't the default:
https:/
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, Jakub Jelinek via Overseers wrote:
> 5) emails used to be sanitized against harvesters, now they aren't
The pipermail munging feature was unusably bad (it messed up Texinfo diffs
very badly, including in the mbox version of the archive, e.g. "+@node" at
the start of a line w
Hi,
Some comments.
Generally, I found the old format to be very good for navigating, and I
would like to have the new one match the old one as closely as possible.
1) the by date monthly list of mails used to be ordered newest to oldest
mails first, now it is oldest to newest, so when dealing
Hi,
I concur with what Jakub wrote. The new web interface is much less useful than
the old one; a severe regression for developers, so to speak.
I also seem to have missed all discussion on this change (if there was
anything). I do not understand why such a huge change was implemented that way,
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 10:28, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 1) the by date monthly list of mails used to be ordered newest to oldest
> mails first, now it is oldest to newest, so when dealing with new stuff one
> has to always scroll down
You can use #end to jump to the bottom.
> 6) there used to be a Ra
On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:46:31AM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Thomas, hi Overseers
>
> I can confirm that those are stripped off!
>
> I did sent an email with three attachments:
> * test.txt (text/plain)
> * test.diff (text/x-diff)
> * the company's disclaimer
>
> The attachment with 'text
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 10:46:31 +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Hi Thomas, hi Overseers
>
> I can confirm that those are stripped off!
>
> I did sent an email with three attachments:
> * test.txt (text/plain)
> * test.diff (text/x-diff)
> * the company's disclaimer
It appears that since the migration
Hi Thomas, hi Overseers
I can confirm that those are stripped off!
I did sent an email with three attachments:
* test.txt (text/plain)
* test.diff (text/x-diff)
* the company's disclaimer
The attachment with 'text/x-diff' MIME was removed :-(
See: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/current/0
> CC overseers.
>
> they are not stripped – I do see them both in my inbox and at
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-March/054050.html
They were stripped for me :-( I even mailed Paul about the (for me) missing
attachment.
Not sure what is going on there, but whatever change was made
CC overseers.
they are not stripped – I do see them both in my inbox and at
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-March/054050.html
However, attachments of the "text/x-…" format (here: text/x-patch)
are no longer shown inline but have to be downloaded (with the
inconvenient suffix: .bin) –
Hi,
looks like the new mailing list setup is stripping off patches. Example:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2020-
March/054050.html
The attachments are also not distributed via mail.
This breaks the gfortran review process. Could somebody please fix this?
Regards
13 matches
Mail list logo
