Jim Wilson writes:
> Yes, it looks like fixing the combiner problem would make it possible to
> remove the mistaken mode checks.
Thanks very much, Jim. I will work toward removing these then.
Adam
Adam Nemet wrote:
Now if I am correct and this last thing is really a bug then the
obvious question is whether it has anything to do with the more
restrictive form for conditional branches on MIPS64? And of course if
I fix it then whether it would be OK to lift the mode restrictions in
the condi
Hi,
I am trying to understand why the MIPS backend's handling of
comparison modes seems to be different from what rtl.texi says:
The mode of the comparison operation is independent of the mode
of the data being compared. If the comparison operation is being tested
(e.g., the first operand
