Re: Library commits vs Bugzilla

2005-11-02 Thread Daniel Berlin
On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 17:20 +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Daniel Berlin wrote: > > >Is this still happening? > > > >I thought i fixed this a few days ago (the perl regex for matching prs > >didn't translate perfectly into python) > > > >Can you please give me a revision number to play with? > > >

Re: Library commits vs Bugzilla

2005-11-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
Daniel Berlin wrote: >Is this still happening? > >I thought i fixed this a few days ago (the perl regex for matching prs >didn't translate perfectly into python) > >Can you please give me a revision number to play with? > Sure: today 106379 fixed libstdc++/23425. Thanks for your quick feedback! P

Re: Library commits vs Bugzilla

2005-11-02 Thread Daniel Berlin
Is this still happening? I thought i fixed this a few days ago (the perl regex for matching prs didn't translate perfectly into python) Can you please give me a revision number to play with? On Wed, 2005-11-02 at 16:57 +0100, Paolo Carlini wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed that library commits fixing

Library commits vs Bugzilla

2005-11-02 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, I noticed that library commits fixing PRs (PR libstdc++/x) don't get notified anymore to Bugzilla and don't get logged in the audit trail. I liked that feature and probably the new behavior is not intended and the other categories work like before. Danny, can you look into that? Thanks in