On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 16:06, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> My feeling is that the Link Time Optimisation (LTO) effort should be soon
> (=is expected to be, or is already) merged inside GCC trunk (future 4.5).
>
> Several years ago, I asked if there is any possibility for an addition
Richard Guenther wrote:
A dream case example would be a plugin for whole program static analysis.
The IPA pass infrastructure has all the necessary bits for this.
How do you deal with several compilation units?
I was thinking LTO is designed for that?
I of course mean the IPA pass infrastru
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:24 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Basile
>> STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> My feeling is that the Link Time Optimisation (LTO) effort should be soon
>>> (=is expected to be, or is already) m
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Hello All,
My feeling is that the Link Time Optimisation (LTO) effort should be soon
(=is expected to be, or is already) merged inside GCC trunk (future 4.5).
Several years ago, I asked if there is any possibi
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> My feeling is that the Link Time Optimisation (LTO) effort should be soon
> (=is expected to be, or is already) merged inside GCC trunk (future 4.5).
>
> Several years ago, I asked if there is any possibility for an addit
Hello All,
My feeling is that the Link Time Optimisation (LTO) effort should be
soon (=is expected to be, or is already) merged inside GCC trunk (future
4.5).
Several years ago, I asked if there is any possibility for an additional
pass to profit of LTO infrastructure to add some extra data
