Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-15 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/14/22 14:06, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote: >> The situation with the Sphinx migration went out of control. The TODO >> list overwhelmed me and there are road-blocks that can't be easily fixed >> with what Sphinx currently supports. > > This migration was/

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > I formatted my new region/endregion pragmas on one line because that > seemed to be how it should be done for rSt, e.g. we had: > > ``#pragma GCC push_options`` ``#pragma GCC pop_options`` > > But I think the attached patch is more correct for how we

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022, Martin Liška wrote: > The situation with the Sphinx migration went out of control. The TODO > list overwhelmed me and there are road-blocks that can't be easily fixed > with what Sphinx currently supports. This migration was/is a huge and complex undertaking, and you have be

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Jonathan Wakely via Gcc
On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 at 08:40, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 11/14/22 03:49, Martin Liška wrote: > > I'm going to revert the patchset during today (Monday) and I'll send a > > patch with a couple > > of new changes that landed in the period of time we used Sphinx. > > The revert is done and I included

Re: Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-14 Thread Martin Liška
On 11/14/22 03:49, Martin Liška wrote: > I'm going to revert the patchset during today (Monday) and I'll send a patch > with a couple > of new changes that landed in the period of time we used Sphinx. The revert is done and I included ce51e8439a491910348a1c5aea43b55f000ba8ac commit that ports al

Revert Sphinx documentation [Was: Issues with Sphinx]

2022-11-13 Thread Martin Liška
Hi. The situation with the Sphinx migration went out of control. The TODO list overwhelmed me and there are road-blocks that can't be easily fixed with what Sphinx currently supports. That would require addition of an upstream support and a possible new Sphinx release. Let me summarize the bigge

Issues with Sphinx

2022-11-11 Thread Andrew Pinski via Gcc
Can we just revert back to texinfo? Sphinx requires manual page splitting which is a downgrade from texinfo. Stable URLs and links was something which we pushed for fixes for texinfo too. And many other issues with sphinx which makes it better if we revert back to texinfo until those are fixed