Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-10 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
January 10, 2022 12:36 AM To: Gary Oblock Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero [EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection practices.] On

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-10 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc
On Fri, Jan 7, 2022 at 9:12 AM Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote: > > An optimization flag that I recently added is being > set to zero in push_cfun (which after a couple of > levels of calls cl_optimization_restore to this.) > > The flag defined like this: > > finterleaving-index-32-bits > Common Var(fla

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
feel like I'm being forced to act like one. 😉 Now, can anybody answer my question? Sincerely Gary From: Gabriel Ravier Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 12:56 AM To: Martin Liška ; Gary Oblock ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined g

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gabriel Ravier via Gcc
On 1/7/22 09:38, Martin Liška wrote: On 1/7/22 09:30, Gary Oblock wrote: Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic and not under my control also we're not supposed to use private emails for work... I respect that. But please respect me that I won't reply to your emails any longer

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 1/7/22 09:30, Gary Oblock wrote: Regarding the corporate legal gibberish. It's automatic and not under my control also we're not supposed to use private emails for work... I respect that. But please respect me that I won't reply to your emails any longer. I don't want to follow the condition

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
ubject: Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero [EXTERNAL EMAIL NOTICE: This email originated from an external sender. Please be mindful of safe email handling and proprietary information protection practices.] On 1/7/22 09:10, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote: > An optimization flag th

Re: Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Martin Liška
On 1/7/22 09:10, Gary Oblock via Gcc wrote: An optimization flag that I recently added is being set to zero in push_cfun (which after a couple of levels of calls cl_optimization_restore to this.) Question is: what's the value of the flag in your IPA pass if you set -finterleaving-index-32-bits?

Issue with a flag that I defined getting set to zero

2022-01-07 Thread Gary Oblock via Gcc
An optimization flag that I recently added is being set to zero in push_cfun (which after a couple of levels of calls cl_optimization_restore to this.) The flag defined like this: finterleaving-index-32-bits Common Var(flag_interleaving_index_32_bits) Init(0) Optimization Structure reorganization